European Academic Association
Community driven academic transparency project for open and efficient education
Community-Driven Knowledge Sharing: Advancing Every Aspect of Research
The European Academic Association is a comprehensive platform dedicated to advancing scientific knowledge across all research outcomes. With two peer-reviewed journals—one focused on significant findings and the other on null or inconclusive results—we ensure that all contributions are valued and play a role in preventing redundant studies. In addition to the journals, the platform supports the submission and peer review of research proposals, working papers, and previously published studies. By fostering transparent collaboration, open discussions, and expert feedback, we create an inclusive environment that promotes innovation and scientific progress. Our commitment extends to offering comprehensive support for both students and seasoned researchers, empowering them to succeed, regardless of the outcomes of their work.
European Consortium for Null Review
Submit your research to community driven null-results journal, specifically aimed and designed to publish null results without new findings.
European Consortium for Scientific Review
Contribute towards an open archive of experiments and analyses with null-results to bring to light past efforts of your peers.
Networking
Connect with researchers around the globe to build your network of connections, collaborate on projects and find your peers.
Project Ownership
Submit your project proposal to claim the ownership of the idea. Receive feedback and suggestions from your peers.
Science Encyclopedia
Creating a platform allowing researchers, academics, scientists and students to create a peer-review driven science-focused encyclopedia.
Our Mission
Our mission is to create a transparent, community-driven platform that upholds the highest standards of peer-reviewed research. We aim to highlight the importance of all research outcomes, including null results, and ensure they contribute to the advancement of scientific knowledge. By supporting students, fostering collaboration, and building a strong academic community, we strive to make research more inclusive, impactful, and accessible to all.
We aim to improve academic efficiency and integrity by offering a platform that values the insights gained from all research, including those with inconclusive or null results. By highlighting these findings, we promote transparency in research and help prevent peers and future researchers from repeating errors or duplicating efforts, ultimately advancing scientific progress more effectively.
What are the Challenges?
In academia, the focus on significant findings often overshadows the value of null results or inconclusive research, making it difficult to publish such work. This leads to the “Researcher’s Dilemma,” where researchers must choose between abandoning valuable projects or further investing in work that may be undervalued. This hampers scientific progress and can diminish the overall research landscape. Our project aims to address these challenges by building a true peer-reviewed platform that emphasizes the importance of all research outcomes, especially null results. We also focus on supporting students and fostering a collaborative academic community that values every contribution to knowledge.
What are our solutions?
Our project offers several key solutions to these challenges. First, we are building a true peer-reviewed platform that gives equal attention to all research outcomes, including null results, ensuring they are recognized and valued. By promoting transparency and rigorous peer review, we prevent valuable insights from being overlooked. Additionally, we provide strong support for students, offering resources and peer feedback to help them grow as researchers. Finally, we are dedicated to fostering a collaborative academic community where researchers can connect, share knowledge, and contribute meaningfully to the advancement of science.
How do we separate lemons from peaches?
We separate high-quality research (“peaches”) from less valuable contributions (“lemons”) through a community-driven process. Researchers submit their work, and our peer network evaluates it through transparent voting and feedback. This community review ensures that only well-conducted, meaningful research moves forward, while lower-quality submissions are identified and addressed. This process maintains the integrity of the platform and ensures that valuable insights are recognized and shared.